Calvin's profileA Passion For Your NamePhotosBlogListsMore Tools Help
    3/11/2005

    Da Vinci code, truth or fiction?

    This is a piece of news cut from CBN.org:

    Lebanese Authorities Ban 'Da Vinci Code'

    (CBN News) - Lebanese authorities have banned "The Da Vinci Code," a novel that has drawn harsh criticism, because they say it is insulting to Christianity.

    The book has a depiction of Jesus Christ marrying Mary Magdalene and fathering a child.
    American author Dan Brown's fast-paced, globe-trotting thriller was pulled off shelves around Lebanon this week on the orders of the General Security Department, after the Catholic Information Center
    recommended it be banned.
    A spokesman for the center told the Associated Press that it was asked for an opinion and gave it. He said, "We cannot accept that anyone insults our dignity and beliefs. Christianity is not about forgiveness to the point of insulting Jesus Christ."

    I spent one week to finish this book which is a best seller in NY Times---(达芬奇密码).  One of my friends recommended it to me and told me that this book can change my belief after read it(I know he's also seeking for the truth.  I respect him but do not agree with what he said.  I hope the Lord will lead him).  I picked up the book and read.  This book is related to the Holy Grail and the hero Mr Landon and heriss Miss Sophia's experiences.  It is a shame that when I finished the half of it, I started to wonder and has been convinced by what the author writes.  But a voice in my heart has been remainding me of that sometimes the evil one will use something looked like truth to confuse people.  I consult to Jim, one of my Christian brothers and my former teacher.  Then he advised me to go to CBN and check.   So the below is one critisim from CBN:

    Dr. Peter Jones: The Da Vinci Dilemma


    The 700 Club

    June 8, 2004


    CBN.comCracking the Code

    The Da Vinci Code has been a New York Times bestseller for the 56 weeks. More than 7.6 million copies have been sold, and there's a movie based on the book being discussed in Hollywood to be produced by Ron Howard. The author, Dan Brown, claims that the book is a work of fiction but that the theories discussed in his book have merit. The Da Vinci Code is purported to be a thriller that indicates Christianity was founded on a cover-up and that the church has been conspiring for years to hide evidence that Jesus was a mere mortal. Fearing that this best-selling novel may be sowing doubt about basic Christian beliefs, churches, clergy, and Bible scholars are rushing to rebut it. Brown also asserts that Leonardo da Vinci imbedded clues in his art that, when discovered and correctly interpreted, would reveal the truth about Christ.

    Much of the fascination with The Da Vinci Code is due to the archaeological discoveries of the Gnostic gospels. These texts are anti-biblical and were written by early Christians whose beliefs departed from the Gospels in the New Testament. They clearly contradict Christianity, which, for today's society, provides a liberating religious option. One can be a "new" Christian who keeps the best of both worlds. The plot of Brown's novel is a twist on the ancient search for the Holy Grail. It denies the divinity of Jesus, and even suggests that Jesus and Mary had a sexual relationship that produced children. For many, these notions are new and startling, but more than anything, the novel is introducing readers in our postmodern society to some of the debates that have gripped scholars of Christian history for decades.

    Old Battle, New Culture

    Peter says there's nothing new about this twist on Christianity, but there has been no other attack like this novel that discredits Jesus, the Bible, and basic Christian doctrine. He believes it's time to separate fact from fiction. "It's naïve to dismiss the significant influence that this neo-pagan worldview is having on the media, education, and politics," says Peter. "Beliefs do impact how we live and the choices we make."

    Peter says that Brown's novel was written from a religious ideology and is not a neutral fictional tale. "We refer at times to da Vinci's code, but for the most part, we call it Brown's code, for we believe Mr. Brown is the original source of this code, not Leonardo," says Peter. "It is a propaganda piece for a religious worldview," he says.

    The real significance of the book is its clear intention to undermine the very foundation of biblical faith and to establish in its place an opposing religious system. If Brown were simply making up a plotline and including far-fetched fantasy, then Peter says a response would not be necessary. But Brown maintains that all he has written is real. "There is a reason Brown wants to stress his work is factual. He wants you to come away with a new mindset," says Peter. Brown questions all traditional historical fact claiming that the church wrote much of history.

    Society's problem with the message of the Bible forces people to reinterpret or rewrite history. In Brown's "new" version of history, power hungry bishops with political aims take over the church and create a Bible in the image of their personal theological choices. The Da Vinci Code uses a fictional structure to get its own message across. While seeming to advocate a search for truth at any price, its real goal is to erode one of the fundamental characteristics of the Christian faith - belief that the original message of the Gospel is the unique, inspired word from God.

    When searching the truth, Peter says be careful to ask questions that increase discernment, not that feed skepticism. Use guides of the novel and have a Bible handy for research. (At the end of Peter's book, there is a reader's guide to The Da Vinci Code.)

     

    Hope God bless everyone and see the truth.

     

    Comments (7)

    Please wait...
    Sorry, the comment you entered is too long. Please shorten it.
    You didn't enter anything. Please try again.
    Sorry, we can't add your comment right now. Please try again later.
    To add a comment, you need permission from your parent. Ask for permission
    Your parent has turned off comments.
    Sorry, we can't delete your comment right now. Please try again later.
    You've exceeded the maximum number of comments that can be left in one day. Please try again in 24 hours.
    Your account has had the ability to leave comments disabled because our systems indicate that you may be spamming other users. If you believe that your account has been disabled in error please contact Windows Live support.
    Complete the security check below to finish leaving your comment.
    The characters you type in the security check must match the characters in the picture or audio.

    To add a comment, sign in with your Windows Live ID (if you use Hotmail, Messenger, or Xbox LIVE, you have a Windows Live ID). Sign in


    Don't have a Windows Live ID? Sign up

    Picture of Anonymous
    ๑۞๑๑۩۞۩๑凸ஜ๑shimY๑ஜ๑۩۞۩2 wrote:
    too good dood,
    ia m very happy to see all this ..
    may God bless you
    Dec. 31
    Picture of Anonymous
    princess_charlotte_ wrote:
    Hi there Calvin, i hope you dont mind but i have mentioned this blog in a blog i have wrote where i briefly have mentioned about the de vinchy code- however ur blog contains alot of information and thought that it wud be interesting for people to read your blog as some people believe that christians shud read the book to learn 'christian history'. i am also going to add you to my list of contacts if you dont mind :) this blog was very informative :) xxx
    Mar. 18
    Picture of Anonymous
    KnightPilgrim wrote:
    The Templar Kinghts.

    These were an order of knights who were set up to protect pilgrims on their way to Jerusalem (hence templar - temple). However, somewhere along the line they got embroiled in the gnosticism cult and the church excommunicated them, then went to war with them. Modern gnostics, including the freemasons still reference them (they use Knight Templar as one of their rank titles). but don't get me started on freemasonry, or i'll be here all day :-)

    I've heard also, that Dan Brown has an agenda of being anti-Roman Catholic, something to do with his childhood I think. I don't know if that's true, but if it is... it gives you some understanding of why he might aim to write such a "contraversial" book. Personally, I object to people rewriting history to make it into an elaborate fantasy. I don't mind fantasy elements in historical fiction... but i do onject to fictitious fantasy passing itself off as fact.

    Blessings

    Nick
    Mar. 12
    Picture of Anonymous
    KnightPilgrim wrote:
    Now, the Catholic church's rampage throughout middle ages France.

    Yes, that is true. The Roman Church at the height of it's secular power diabolically chased down men and women and systematically wiped them out for heresy or blasphemy. Why? To kill ideas... such as gnosticism (I mentioned earlier) docetism, dualism and other heresies. The Code book suggests that during one particularly fierce siege, the templar knights were wiped out in a French fortress, during the siege however, 4 monks sneaked out with something. Brown suggests this was a child who was descended from Christ & Mary. The view of secular scholars, is that it was more likely to be scrolls that the heretics were trying to protect... probably the gnostic gospels. They believe this because they use the source evidence of captured heretics who were interrogated. The Roman church had a lot to gain by declaring someone heretic, it could seize whoever's lands and money, and this was as much motivation (sadly) as stamping out heresy.
    Mar. 12
    Picture of Anonymous
    KnightPilgrim wrote:
    There are tales of refugees sailing from the Holy Land to the south coast of France, but this was to be expected because of the War of the Jews that started in AD70. Many people fled for their lives after the siege of Jerusalem. There were many people called Mary, Joseph, and even Jesus at that time, they were popular names. You find them scattered all over 1st century graves. In no way do SECULAR historians accept the theory that Mary Magdalene bore a child to christ... and that's important. These are people who don't neccesarily have faith in christ, so they have no axe to grind, they are impartial... if they say there is no evidence, then I'm prepared to accept their scholarly view over that of an author.
    Mar. 12
    Picture of Anonymous
    KnightPilgrim wrote:
    Secondly, Mary Magdalene. The only evidence we have for any relationship with Jesus, is the gospel attributed to Philip, which is fragmented... it seems to suggest that Jesus kissed her once (it breaks off as to where) and that the disciples got jealous, that's all... there is no evidence for a marriage. Also, Philip's gospel is one of the gnostic gospels. It has a message that is contrary to the works of John, Peter and Paul among others. Gnosticism was/is a heresy that promotes the idea that the physical world is an evil lie made by the devil, and that all physical matter is evil.. but God who is spirit will save our spirits alone. This is wrong, because Jesus had a body but was perfect in every way and it suggests even the things we eat and touch corrupt us. Gnosticism also promotes the idea that salvation is through special knowledge (greek word "gnosis"), not the divine gift of God's grace.

    This is why Philip's gospel was left out, because it's authorship is questioned.
    Mar. 12
    Picture of Anonymous
    KnightPilgrim wrote:
    Hi Calven... first things first... welcome back! Your absence had me a bit worried for a while, not with regard to your faith, but your wellbeing.

    Right to the Da Vinci code... hopefully, having seen a documentary that rationally and methodically debunked it, I can give you a few weapons in your arsenal!

    Firstly the Priory of Sion... does not exist. The list of supposed members was made up in the 60's in France by a journalist, an eccentric lord and a local civic leader. They invented it as a sort of fraternal joke, to entertain the latter man's fantasy of him being the rightful heir to the title of "King of France". In the 1980's a book was written that made similar claims to the Da Vinci Code... and it was at this time that the hoaxers came forward and admitted what they had done, in no way were they claiming to be descendents of Christ. The church with a giant PS inscribed in it, is nothing to do with the fictional Priory, but the French churches patronage.
    Mar. 12

    Trackbacks (7)

    The trackback URL for this entry is:
    http://calven.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!CECD48C3FC9C612B!373.trak
    Weblogs that reference this entry